Technological innovations are evolving so quickly that society
is having a difficult time reflecting on how to use these tools efficiently and
with purpose. This is the reason for the
daunting dilemma Turkle describes. Although not the first smartphone, the iPhone
was launched in 2007, a little over 10 years ago. A decade ago, we were introduced to this
powerful device that fits in the palm of our hand. Did we understand the possible ramifications
of this tool? We have been enamored by
the small, lighted screen. The invention
is being used for communicating, yet we are missing the meaningful
conversations we had in the past. It has
affected families, friends, and colleagues; our relationships have become
superficial, and we have become shallow as we share only the best parts of
ourselves (experiences and pictures) that lack depth and reflection as we post
this information on social media. Sites.
Although we have 100s and 1000s of “friends,” we are lonely due to connecting
to the disconnectedness of our culture.
It doesn’t have to be this way. We can have the deepest and most important of
all tasks to undertake with the help of digital devises and social media. Create the purpose and let the tools guide
you to explore the possibilities that were not available 11 years ago. Michael Wesch, a cultural anthropologist from
Kansas State University, had similar concerns about smart phones. He discovered students were disengaged with
their classes. Only half read the required
articles for class and only a quarter found them interesting. Wesch feels questions, the basis for
stimulating discussions, are not being asked. Thought-provoking questions require higher
order metacognitive skills, and good questions are usually answered with more good
questions. Postman and Weingartner,
through Wesch, argue that “the environment (or medium) of learning is more
important than the content (the message), and therefore teachers should begin
paying more attention to the learning environment they help to create.”
To motivate students, Wesch worked towards creating a more
interactive space by having students connect using various social media sites; this
generated interest, but it was not the reason for learning. As we move towards a global society, our interconnectedness
will be the key to a healthy, peaceful planet, and how will we do this? Wesch gave statistics of the tremendous
progress we have made with technology, and along with this growth, has been unparalleled
global inequality. Students were required
to work together to develop solutions to these problems. Students became aware of their abilities to
make positive changes globally and took ownership of the mission. Wesch doesn’t
claim to know the answers and looks at the assignment as a quest. The technology becomes the tool to assist in
generating research and meaningful communication. It was the project that guided the technology. Projects, similar to Wesch’s, will encourage
meaningful dialogue and conversations that have been missing, especially in academic
environments.
I believe that Wesch has a good blueprint on how to move forward and inspire our students. It is crucial that we motivate them to reach these thought provoking questions and the only way to do that is to change the dynamic of the classroom.
ReplyDelete